|
Daily Independent Online.
* Friday, August 13, 2004.
Why we’ll allow foreign monitors for US poll, by State
Dept
By
Chinedu Offor
Correspondent,
Washington D.C.
Acceptance of foreign
observers to monitor November's Presidential election is not an indication that the
United States can no longer
organise a free and fair
poll, State
Department officials have said.
This comes on the heels of
what diplomats said is an unprecedented decision by the State Department to allow the Organisation for Security
and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
monitor the election.
The decision is a fall out of
the controversial 2000 election, especially in Florida, which gave
victory to President George Bush at
the expense of then Vice President Al Gore.
Democrats insist that Gore
would have won the election if foreign observers were present to it.
Their argument is that foreign
observers would have deterred state officials from allegedly preventing
thousands of African Americans from voting, which would have given the
state to Gore enough to win the Presidency.
Since the election, Democrats
have questioned the legitimacy of Bush and have used every avenue to
pressure the administration to
allow observers in.
The Republican Party opposes
the demand, arguing that it reduces the influence of the U.S. to act as an observer in
elections especially in the developing democracies of Africa and Asia.
Party officials reluctantly
endorsed the idea only after
Democrats threatened to
bring the Florida ballot up during a Presidential debate between
Bush and contender John Kerry.
Democrat representative
Barbara Lee hailed the move as a step in the right direction to ensure
the poll will be free and fair.
The fears of the Republicans,
however, appear to be well founded. According to an African diplomat, "if they are now admitting
they could not get it right without observers, they have no moral justification to criticise
African governments of being unable to organise free and fair
elections".
|