This man who preached reparation has lost everything, and no one is out there to preach about his losses.
This catalogue of abuses and losses beginning form the First Republic to 1998 beckoned for redress and punishment. Redress for those whose rights have been violated and trampled upon. Punishment for those who grossly violated the rights of others and made them to suffer without justification. At that time, Olusegun Obasanjo had himself just been liberated from prison where he had been served a very raw deal by the Abacha government. He was substantially sober to realise that a lot was unjustly done in the past, and that genuine reconciliation was needed to heal the wounds and re-unite Nigerians.
In June 1999, President Obasanjo put together an eight-man Human Rights Investigation Panel which was charged with the assignment to examine cases of human rights abuses since 1984. Why the time frame was put at 1984 was perhaps, to make it convenient in terms of volume of work which the panel will be saddled with if it were backdated to 1960. But as it turned out, Nigerians who suffered aggravated damages had to go beyond the 1984 time frame to locate their injuries. For instance, the Igbo demanded for three trillion naira as reparation for the losses Ndigbo suffered during the civil war.
The idea really was to heal the wounds in a manner that was likened to the South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), a post-apartheid fact-finding commission which apportioned blames and secured remorse from all parties which played roles in the days of apartheid.
Justice Chukwudifu Oputa, chairman of the panel, which was later named a commission promised to heal the wounds and reconcile aggrieve people with those who tormented them. He said; "We will ascribe blames, but we will try to heal the wounds of the nation. We want to see that the wounds of the past are healed. In a way, justice must be done to the victims, and justice must be done to the society at large. An eye for an eye will leave every body blind, that is the central philosophy behind our work. Primarily, we are not a court of law, we make recommendations to the government and the government will now make decisions whether people should be charged to court, whether people should pay reparation."
That was the mandate and the understanding at the setting up of the commission. Nigerians were enthusiastic, that there was going to be an opportunity for them to ventilate anger and seek redress. At the close of the submission of memoranda, the commission received 1,500 memoranda from members of the public and it chronicled the very worse of abuses anybody could imagine. To the extent that, Justice Oputa, no minding his long years of service in the judiciary was shocked at what Nigerians can do to one another. He said, "sometimes, I feel worried when I read contents of the memoranda. I ask myself, did all these occur in Nigeria. I'm sure if you read some of the memoranda you will feel like crying."
That was how serious the matter was, until some people who didn't want to be questioned over their pasts decided to take the commission to court over its Constitutional validity. From that point, it already appeared that some past actors are not ready yet for any reconciliation. Particularly, former Presidents Mohammed Buhari and Ibrahim Babangida refused to appear before the Commission. Justice Oputa equally decided not to force them to appear because of what he called, "the need to nurture and consolidate the nation's nascent and fledging democracy." According to him, the pains of an ensuing prosecution might traumatise the polity.
However, the HRVIC concluded its investigations and submitted its report to President Obasanjo. The president decided to sit on it, apparently, for fear of stepping on toes and perhaps, to sustain the present level of peaceful co-existence. For according to Justice Oputa, "If the nation were to embark on criminal prosecution, we may find that few people would be spared. It is absolutely necessary for us to quickly lose the dark and bleak chapters of our history to avoid confrontation with erstwhile powerful forces now sitting on the fence and waiting for opportunity to stage a come back."
That opportunity has come, and these people are still not remorseful. Prof. Wole Soyinka has asked IBB to apologise to Nigerians for wasting their time , money and many lives in prosecuting his fake political programmes which ended in June 12, 1993.
While it has become clear that the present government does not have the will to open the HRVIC report for public scrutiny, and does not intend to provide opportunities for genuine reconciliation, some Nigerians have already started to humble themselves before those who nurse anger towards them.
Gen. Yakubu Gowon is an exemplary statesman in this regard. He goes about trying to heal wounds which his actions while in government, decades ago may have caused. He has explained the reasons why the civil war became inevitable and has apologised to all who were affected. He has apologised to Soyinka over his detention during his (Gowon's) days in government. Gowon attended the burial service of late Gen. Joseph Garba, one of his closest lieutenants who staged the coup which ousted him from office. He is a peace loving statesman who goes about spreading true and genuine reconciliation.
Former president Shehu Shagari has also expressed love and forgiveness for those who staged the coup that ousted him from office. That coup was very upsetting for some of the politicians who got a raw deal from the military government of Gen. Buhari. For instance, Umaru Dikko is yet to forgive that government for attempting to smuggle him home from the United Kingdom in a crate. For that, Shagari has shown sufficient magnanimity. It was Shagari who also granted state pardon to Gowon and Odumegwu Ojukwu during the Second Republic.
Until recently, Buhari and Babangida could not see eye to eye , because of the feeling of guilt and anger after the coup which transferred power to the IBB boys in 1985. Many survivors and families of coup victims are still full of rage and anger against those who executed their love ones.
There is a lot of anger in the land and it is difficult to predict what will happen next, particularly, when some culprits are still going about without the slightest show of remorse. The situation now is not better than it was during the military days, more crime is being committed and many people and communities are asking for justice. People are aggrieved in Odi; as there is anger in Zaki Biam. People are mortally injured in Kano as there is pain on the Plateau. Why is it so difficult for president Obasanjo to open old wounds and bring the culprits to book; why is it difficult for there to be genuine reconciliation in Nigeria