ADO-EKITI — TWO police officers attached to Ekiti State police command yesterday told Election Petition Tribunal how the State Governor, Mr. Ayo Fayose allegedly disrupted the conduct of April 3, 2004 rescheduled council polls in Ekiti South-West Local Government.
The police officers, Taiwo Balogun and Titilope Aratile who were in the witness box in Ado Ekiti yesterday alleged that Governor Fayose stormed the council area with retinue of mobile policemen and some soldiers with fake name tags to hijack ballot boxes at the various voting centers.
The evidence of the two officers came on the heels of the various petitions filed by the candidates of Alliance for Democracy (AD), National Conscience Party (NCP) and all Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), calling for the nullification of the result of the election, won by Mr. Joseph Omolase of the Peoples Democracy Party (PDP).
The trio of Alhaji Remi Badmus (AD) Chief Michael Ajasin (NCP) and Chief (Mrs) Abike Olowoporoku (ANPP) had dragged Omolase to the tribunal calling for the nullification of his election on the ground that the election did not take place in the council area on April 3, 2004.
In her own evidence, Titi Aratile a mobile police officer attached to the local government equally testified that the governor; hijacked the ballot box at her centre.
She said: “I was posted to the poling unit 11, at ward 11 in Ilawe-Ekiti at about 9.30 am. Governor Ayo Fayose came to the ward with mobile policemen and soldiers, and said he wanted us to cooperate. I said how and he replied that he wanted to collect the papers and cast them inside the box. But when I said no the governor replied that if I did not agree, they will carry the ballot box away.
“Then I said our Divisional Police Officer had told us that the safety of the ballot box was our duty at the polling unit. The governor ordered those who followed him to carry the box, but I struggled with them. They then pushed me aside”.
Under cross-examination, the police woman said her information about the conduct of the election should be relied upon than that of the commissioner of police who was not in position to witness the exercise.