|
Daily
Independent Online.
* Monday, July 05, 2004.
Supreme Court
voids conviction of Air Force officer
By Rotimi
Fadeyi,
Senior Correspondent, Abuja
The Supreme Court last Friday
declared as unjustified the conviction of Squadron Leader O.T. Onyeukwu
by the General Court Martial (the GCM) for alleged conspiracy and theft
in April 1996.
The apex court ruled that there
was insufficient evidence to prove that Onyeukwu was guilty of the
offence.
With the judgment, the court
dismissed the appeal by the state and affirmed the judgment of the Court
of Appeal, which also voided the decision of the court martial and
consequently discharged and acquitted Onyeukwu.
In the lead judgment by Justice
Samson Odemwingie Uwaifo, the court disagreed with the Court of Appeal
that the proceeding of the court martial in which the squadron leader was
jointly tried with eight others was a nullity.
Six other justices of the apex
court agreed with the lead judgement of Uwaifo. They are Idris Legbo
Kutigi; Sylvester Umaru Onu; Aloysius Iyorgyer Katsina- Alu; Umaru Atu
Kalgo; Dahiru Musdapher and Ignatius Chukwudi Pats- Acholonu.
Reviewing the case, Justice
Uwaifo said there were eight other separate indictments brought against
different individuals. Those indictments were consolidated with the respondent’s
indictment and a joint trial of all the nine accused persons was
conducted by the GCM held at Ikeja, Lagos. On October1996, the GCM found
the respondent guilty on seven counts of conspiracy and theft.
In addition, Onyeukwu was to
pay a total of N2, 250,000 while the conviction, sentences and order were
confirmed by the confirming authority. But on June 22, 2000, the Court of
Appeal set aside the decision of the court martial. It discharged and
acquitted Onyeukwu.
The state then appealed to the
Supreme Court to challenge the verdict of the Court of Appeal. But last
Friday, the apex court said the joint trial was in order. It held that
Onyeukwu had the option to object to the joint trial of the separate
indictments as provided for in section 168 of the Criminal Procedure Act
(CPA), but he did not.
The court
therefore endorsed the joint trial but declared that Onyeukwu was wrongly
convicted, as the evidence adduced was not enough to warrant his
conviction. The apex ruled that the appeal by the state lacked merit and
was dismissed.
|