|
Daily
Independent Online.
* Thursday, July 08, 2004.
Power shift vital to Delta unity�— Asagba
By Tunke-Aye Bisina
Reporter, Asaba
The
Asagba of Asaba, Professor Chike Edozien, has joined
the ranks of those agitating for power shift in Delta State in 2007,
saying it is imperative for the unity of the state.
The
monarch made his position known on Tuesday while speaking with
journalists as part of the activities marking his 13th Coronation
Anniversary celebration.
Backing
the Delta North and South agitation for power shift from the Delta Central zone to
other parts in 2007, the monarch explained:” It is necessary to rotate
power so that everybody would have a sense of belonging. It is, in fact,
imperative to nation-building. There is nothing uncivilised about it. It
is a way of life.
“Even
in our traditional institutions, most areas have rotating traditional
rulership among ruling houses…. Even in the European Union, they are
talking about power sharing and rotational presidency.
”To me,
the people of Delta North and Delta South wanting power rotation is not
anti-Urhobo but pro-Delta.”
Speaking
on his 13-year reign, the Asagba noted: “Since our ascension
to the throne, we have committed ourselves to a life of service and to
the uplifting of the quality of life of our people. The challenges that
stared us in the face have been quite daunting, but we were determined to
face them with hope, courage and determination.
“The
zeal and determination with which we embarked on this mission has not
waned as we are determined to pull through with the support of our
people. We are happy that considerable progress has been made in this
regard.”
The
monarch however decried the slow pace of infrastructural development and
the government’s acquisition of land in the state capital without
compensation, noting that both the Federal and state governments have not
met the expectations of the people in infrastructural development in the
state capital.
He
argued that acquiring land for government business was in order, but that
a situation where lands have to be acquired on behalf of individuals who
now engage in trading with such lands to the chagrin of the erstwhile
owners is not justified.
|