BNW

 

B N W: Biafra Nigeria World News

 

BNW Headline News

 

BNW: The Authority on Biafra Nigeria

BNW Writer's Block 

BNW Magazine

 BNW News Archive

Home: Biafra Nigeria World

 

BNW Message Board

 WaZoBia

Biafra Net

 Igbo Net

Africa World 

Submit Article to BNW

BNWlette

BNWlette

BNWlette

BNWlette

BNWlette

 

Domain Pavilion: Best Domain Names

champion-newspapers.com article_2

About Champion Newspapers

Make contact with Champion Newspapers

Read Archives on Champion Newspapers

Subscribe to Champion Newspapers Archives

Check your mails

search documents

champion logo

     

click to place an advert

...For a better society...

Wednesday, July 28 2004

Vol 17 No.30

News

Editorial

Politics

Opinion

Features

Foreign News

The Arts

Sports

Education

Business

  • Money/Market

  • Travels/Tourism

  • Property/Environment

  • Columnists


  • New Page 10

    Fuel crisis: A change of strategy

    IFECHUKWU C. UKWUEGBU

    OIL became a tool of international politics after the Arab-Israel War of 1973 (Yom Kippor War). That was when the Arab world converted the free gift of nature which they are endowed with to an instrument of war. The situation then, was a frustrated Western world whose economy was oil-driven. The worst hit countries then were Japan and Holland. The citizens of these countries along with other affected countries started using bicycle and other non-fuel consuming transport systems to drive their economy.

    There were pictures in magazines then of Japanese and Dutch Prime Ministers going to their office on bicycle. On a long term solution, Western countries started the venture into non-oil energy sources. OPEC became prominent and started determining the price of fuel. At the same period quota of production for countries came into existence. Trusting the power of the Western Countries, apart from looking into other sources of energy, the need to lobby and control oil production countries became their goal. Today, while the oil machinery is still where it was then, the control and manipulation of the leaders are now in the hand of the Western nations.

    The major oil producing countries, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and recently Libya as well as the cartel, OPEC, are within the axis of control of the oil consuming countries. The ones they could not get by political manoeuvre, they use brute force to achieve.

    The genesis of oil/petrol crisis in Nigeria started with the regime of Babangida. That was the period of Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), when through the manipulation of the World Bank, our government was asked to remove subsidy in the price of fuel and other public utilities. Our government agreed and since then, the oil sector has not known peace. Also, our government at the same time saw the oil refineries as sources of personal enrichment. Huge sums of money were allocated for turn-around maintenance of the refineries which were never used for the purpose. Allocation of oil blocks was politicized and instead of giving them to technocrats in the field, they are used to placate friends or favour interest groups in the name of indigenisation.

    Today, the common resource of the country is discreetly used to meet individual greed through, turnaround maintenance fee paid with no maintenance, allocation of oil blocks, allocation of crude oil to individuals who sale them at the spot market etc. With all these, the common man carries the burden through frequent increase in the cost of petroleum resources for local consumption. The after effect of this, is the frequent call for strike which seems to be the only known tool of the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC).

    The pattern has always been the same, the Federal government increases fuel price, the Nigerian Labour Congress calls for a strike, the populace willingly or unwillingly follow the NLC, a negotiation begins and at the end of the Federal government and NLC agree a price higher than where they started. A win-win situation according to marketing gurus. The success or failure of each strike exercise has always been a subject of debate. Should we continue the deceitful macabre round robbin dance of fuel increase-strike-fuel increase. We need a different strategy and as solution to this perennial crisis that continues to rear its head in our dear country and inhibit the progress of individuals and the country. Immediately after the last strike, government spokesmen came up with the fact that the only option available for the country to progress is total deregulation which otherwise implies increase in fuel price and the incessant strikes.

    Deregulation and removal of subsidy have been the catchwords of the present administration.

    Deregulation, we are told by the economist, means allowing the market forces to determine the price of product. Proponents continue to make reference to the telecommunication industry, with the regular availability of telephone lines (Land or Mobile) as its gain. The cost of consumption and its personal effect on the individual budget notwithstanding.

    We are meant to believe that the Federal government is subsidizing some of our consumptions hence removal of subsidy to allow the government to transfer cost to the consumer. To the federal government, subsidy is eroding the financial resources that would have been used to provide more valuable social services to the general public and that the benefits go only to the wealthy in the society. With subsidy, deregulation becomes unrealistic, which makes private investment in the downstream sector of the oil operation unattractive. What is not clear is whether the subsidy is to meet the cost of operation or the service the high level corruption in the government.

    Personally, deregulation and removal of subsidy are necessary, if the gains of the two economic factors will get to the common man. But the problem in our country presently is the level of corruption, and profligacy, which are endemic in government operation, and take the gains of these laudable economic factors away from the ordinary Nigerian, hence the worry of the majority of Nigerians and the Nigerian Labour Congress.

    The level of corruption in governance is so high that it is an international issue with monitoring agencies given our dear country a negative result every time. The federal government goes about paying only lip-service to the fight against it. Obvious levels of corruption are there for every eye despite the due-process slogan of the Federal government. The agents of government want the ordinary citizens to report what is glaring everywhere. Whom do we report to when every person in government has his own price. The story is told that the Customs Department only publicize the catch of a smuggler whenever the under the table negotiation fails, otherwise how come the camel continues to pass through the needle’s eye?

    The Police PRO wants Nigerians to report any act of extortion by the police to a higher police authority. What a fallacy. A story is told of a citizen who went to a police station to report an act of robbery, only to see the very robber at the counter in police uniform to receive the report. Nobody told him to turn back and run for his dear life.

    Take a trip along our major highways and see how the police patrol teams on the roads have turned travelling into a nightmare both to the commercial vehicles and private car owners. Maybe, as some top police personnel used to say, it is a national malaise that need to be nationally handled by the national leaders. But where are the leaders to do that. We are waiting for the messiah. The recent clash between the police and the air-force-men is a good omen for we bloody civilians. If the clash had been with the civilians the police PRO would have gone free with his lies and the effect on the civilians would have been devastating. Of course, there will be no probe and the government will agree with the police.

    The level of waste and profligacy are the other problems that inhibit the positive development of the economy. The volume of fuel being consumed daily in the country is just too high for the population. The multifarious, and frivolous trips by government personnel are of prohibitive cost to the government. The vious first ladies have turned their offices to prolific source of jamboree, where the display of wealth is the order of the day. Not quite long ago our prime first lady took a plane load of women to USA to sing ‘O se o Jesu’ for her child’s graduation. A story is told of how a, not-so-high employee of NNPC, who made a request for fuel from the Corporation to run his generator during the fuel crisis for his mother’s burial, was given a tanker load. We all know what that means, 33,000 litres of fuel free-of-charge to run generator. May be a shipload of the fuel or crude oil will be given if such request had come from the Group Managing Director or any of the Executive Directors. At the end of the day, all these cost are transferred to the common man in the street with the aphorism "removal of subsidy".

    Today, the most lucrative, job is political appointment, or government service, be it federal, state or local government. The consequent adverse effect is the strangulation of personal entrepreneur and professionalism. Until the reverse is realised, the whole concept of needs will be an exercise in futility. Afterall, all the expected gains of NEEDS anchor on private enterprise development. How will that development come to be if everybody is aspiring to be a political appointee or government employee, where within months you are endowed with exotic cars, houses and grandiose life-style to the envy of the general public.

    To wriggle out of the fuel crisis and its ripple effects, the nation needs to adopt a new strategy alone the following lines: Deregulation and removal of subsidy should be allowed for the economy to grow. The point has been made that no government allows market forces to determine consumption prices totally and that some levels of subsidy are always necessary. The agriculture subsidy and the recent steel production subsidy in USA are given as examples. If we review these subsidies-we shall realise they are to improve production and not for consumption as the case of fuel subsidy is in Nigeria.

    The level of consumption, waste and profligacy should be curtailed. The Federal Government and NLC should start a campaign to reduce the level of consumption and waste in the economy. Many cars are on our roads. One effect of this is the traffic jam, which consumes a lot of fuel.

    People should be advised to reduce the high-level fuel consumption by minimal use of private cars. Employers of labour should provide mass transit vehicles. They should encourage their workers to make use of them rather than personal cars. The government at all levels should be sincere in the development of mass transit transportation system. Not the type of exercise that the Lagos State Government did on the Victoria Island where 14-seater buses are called mass transit buses, but ironically used to replace older 14-seater buses. The situation on the Victoria Island has returned to the status quo no matter the colour of the buses, terrible traffic jam and long wait of commuters.

    Our level of endurance and avoidance should increase such that if the price of a commodity is increased unnecessarily, we should stop to buy to force it to come down. The practice of buying and storing fuel at any price to be on the road will not help in any struggle against fuel increase. The buying of phone recharge card at higher price is uncalled for. Afterall, a few years ago all of us lived without the phone. We should not rely on strikes to solve the problem whenever Adam Oshiomhole and some civil rights advocates call on us for action. All of us should participate, not by fighting but by refusing what we consider to be outrageous and unjustifiable prices of petroleum products. General boycott is necessary to make marketers realistic in their price fixing.

    Nigeria is endowed with vast natural and human resources. It is the envy of most other African nations. We should have not come to the present level of decadence, if our leaders and the populace were sincere. Despite our wealth potentials, we go about begging for debt forgiveness. How did we incur the debt in the first instance, and why are we still borrowing? We do not have functional Airline, Shipping line, Railway system and our Government is doing nothing. The only concern is oil. God save us.

    •Ukwuegbu lives in Lagos.

    � 2004 @ Champion Newspapers Limited (All Right Reserved).
    Powered By dnetsystems.net dnet�




     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    BNWlette

    BNWlette

    BNW News

    BNWlette

    BNWlette

    Voice of Biafra | Biafra World | Biafra Online | Biafra Web | MASSOB | Biafra Forum | BLM | Biafra Consortium

     

     

     

     

     

     

     Axiom PSI Yam Festival Series, Iri Ji Nd'Igbo the Kola-Nut Series,Nigeria Masterweb

    Norimatsu | Nigeria Forum | Biafra | Biafra Nigeria | BLM | Hausa Forum | Biafra Web | Voice of Biafra | Okonko Research and Igbology |
    | Igbo World | BNW | MASSOB | Igbo Net | bentech | IGBO FORUM | HAUSA NET (AWUSANET) | AREWA FORUM | YORUBA NET | YORUBA FORUM | New Nigeriaworld | WIC: World Igbo Congress