The State Security
Service (SSS), yesterday declared that Ikemba Nnewi, Chief Odum-egwu Emeka Ojukwu has over dramatised his invitation by the service saying his conduct is inimical to peace and stability in the country.
Chief Ojukwu who was invited by the service on Monday, refused to honour the invitation to Abuja, alleging at a press conference in Enugu that the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI), has been detailed by government to kill him alongside leader of the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB), Chief Ralph Uwazurike.
He said the SSS did not tell him why he was being invited to Abuja, but said it might not be unconnected with his support for Biafra and MASSOB.
The SSS in a statement signed by Ezra Tobechukwu on behalf of the director general, explained that as far as security is concerned, the corporate existence of Nigeria is a matter which is beyo-nd politics.
“The reality today is that while some leaders are striving assiduously to build a better Nigeria for all, some are committed to dismembering the country, through violent or non-violent means and disturbing the peace which all enjoy,” Ezra said.
The statement explained that it’s action was in line with the laws of the federation, saying, “If for any reason, the conduct of any individual is inimical to peace and stability, the service has a duty to call that person or group to order through lawful means.”
The service explained that Chief Ojukwu was accorded all the courtesies and respect due to an elder and statesman, saying that Ojukwu was encouraged to come along with his lawyer and any other person he wishes to be present during the planned interaction.
“Apparently, Chief Ojukwu misunderstood the gesture and took fright, out of concern for his personal comfort, which unfortunately is consonant with his character over the years,” the statement said.
The statement warned that the service will not join issues with Chief Ojukwu, “but having rejected the option of dialogue, other course of lawful action open to the service will be pursued to their logical end to address the matter. Clearly, if the intention was to arrest the chief, that would have been done through due process without hesitation.”
|
|
